BuzzFlash.com Presents:


Honoring reporters who just can't handle the truth!

July 10, 2008

Zev Chafets

For reporting that is an embarrassment to the profession of journalism, and for being beholden to corporate paymasters rather than the citizens of America.

Congratulations to Zev Chafets!

You are the first member of the Fourth Estate to be named a BuzzFlash Media Putz for your coverage of a BuzzFlash Media Putz; specifically your recent New York Times Sunday Magazine homage to Rush Limbaugh.

We want to thank nationally noted media critic and BuzzFlash reader Eric Boehlert for nailing Chafets for his uncritical, vanity profile of the newly minted $400 million blowhard.

Limbaugh, who is beloved by many of the white working class stiffs who have been lured by his siren song of demagoguery, is revealed as a man of gargantuan and ostentatious wealth, including an obscenely pretentious mansion and a garage full of cars that each cost more than three bungalows in Cleveland. But Chafets is not critical of this irony; he is enamored of Limbaugh the "American success story."

Here is an excerpt of Chafets being queried about his sycophantic article on an NPR program, "On the Media":

BOB GARFIELD: Your piece on Limbaugh was very generous, I would say even flattering. You seem to give him a pass for his excesses. And when I'm talking about excesses, I'm talking about ad hominem attacks, truly mean-spirited stuff that goes way beyond satire and into the politics of vilification, and also playing fast and loose with the truth, seizing on some news item and grossly misrepresenting it and creating a lot of hubbub, using as the kernel of his satire something that is just fundamentally untrue.

ZEV CHAFETS: Well, do you have an example of that? I'm not an apologist for Rush Limbaugh, but I'm a little bit defensive because I think that the liberal media takes such an unfair view of him.

I hear people being vilified on the radio, on all sorts of radio stations by all sorts of people all day long. And Limbaugh is not worse than many of the ones I hear, even on NPR. He just has a different point of view.

BOB GARFIELD: "The NAACP should have a riot rehearsal, they should get a liquor store and practice robberies?"

ZEV CHAFETS: Not my sense of humor, but it's not a lie.

BOB GARFIELD: Did Limbaugh not say that Abu Ghraib was no worse than a Skull and Bones initiation?

ZEV CHAFETS: Yeah, he did. It's his opinion.

You get the feeling that Chafets, whom Boehlert calls a "Dittohead, is actually a "Deadhead."

Surprisingly, Chafets has 10 books under his belt and writes regularly for mainstream publications such as the NYT. But that may not be as surprising as it seems.

At one point in the Limbaugh "portrait," Chafets reveals to us: "In truth, Limbaugh is less a theoretician than a popularizer of what he regards as the correct conservative responses to contemporary issues. Most of his concerns are economic. 'I consider myself a defender of corporate America,' he told me."

Ah, now we get to the crux of it. Limbaugh is a shill for corporate America, and The New York Times Company is part of that corporate America. Limbaugh's agent wouldn't have agreed to the interview and profile unless he was relatively sure that it was going to be positive -- and he wasn't wrong.

Sure The New York Times is assailed as "liberal" by the likes of Limbaugh, but when was the last time you saw serious and sustained coverage in the "newspaper of record" about the economic class divisions in America that have accelerated since the Reagan era?

What benefits corporate America benefits The New York Times Company.

And so Zev Chafets did his job well -- and for that he deserves being named the BuzzFlash Media Putz of the Week.